Labor's
Gotta Play Hardball to Win! ILWU to Shut Down West Coast Ports May 1 to Protest War (March 2008). click on photo for article
|
April 2008 For Workers Strikes Against the War!
Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants! All
Out on May Day!
ILWU members demonstrate outside union headquarters in July 2002 over contract. Now longshore workers are set to shut down all 29 West Coast ports against the war. On
May 1, all 29 ports on the U.S. West Coast are to be shut down by the
International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) in protest against
the U.S.
war on Afghanistan and Iraq. This is a historic event of
international significance:
labor action against imperialist war by a major American union. The
strategically placed port workers in the ILWU can bring commerce with
Asia to a
grinding halt, and they’re about to demonstrate it. The maritime
employers are
already screaming, and you can bet it’s got the attention of the
warmongers in
Washington. All labor should take up the challenge this poses: For
workers
strikes against the war! Hit ’em where they feel it. Meanwhile,
immigrants’ rights groups are once again mobilizing on May Day. We say:
everyone here should have equal rights; otherwise the bosses and
reactionaries
play one group off against another. Full citizenship rights for all
immigrants! Mobilize labor action to stop the ICE raids! And on
April 30
and May 1, the independent truckers who move cargo to and from the
docks may
play an important role in a shutdown, particularly in Los Angeles
(where
immigrant truckers closed the port on May Day 2006) and possibly some
East
Coast ports. The
imperialist war on Afghanistan and Iraq is also a war on immigrants,
minorities, working people and democratic rights “at home.” As a longshore picketer
declared in
2002, the “War on Terror is a War on Us.” We need to defeat this
attack
here and abroad, in opposition to both the capitalist war
parties. The
“antiwar movement,” whose aim has always been to pressure the
Democrats, is at
a dead end. But a battle is brewing. Workers, immigrants,
opponents of
imperialist war: All out on May Day! The
Bay Area ILWU local was the first American union to condemn the war. In
April
2003, as invading U.S. troops reached Baghdad, six longshoremen were
injured
and a union official was arrested as police fired on hundreds of
antiwar
protesters in the port of Oakland. Now, while Democrats in Congress
keep voting
for the war budget, while all the presidential candidates of
the twin
parties of American capital vow to keep U.S. troops in Iraq indefinitely
and
to expand NATO occupation forces in Afghanistan, dock
workers have
decided to shut down the entire Pacific Coast in the most powerful
single
action in decades aimed at stopping a U.S. war. When
we broke the story last month, many rubbed their eyes in disbelief.
Yes, it’s
for real. In a notice posted on the ILWU website and printed in the
union
newspaper, The Dispatcher (April 2008), the union announced:
“Longshore
Caucus calls for Iraq war protest at ports on May 1.” The resolution by
the
union’s elected delegates called for this unprecedented labor action to
“demand
an immediate end to the war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and
the
withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Middle East” (see ILWU motion, page
3). The
longshore delegates said they were issuing a “clarion call” with an
“urgent
appeal for unity of action” to all of labor “to bring an end to this
bloody war
once and for all.” Now it’s up to the rest of us. The workers
movement and
all opponents of imperialist war should follow the lead of the West
Coast
waterfront workers. Industrial
action by one of the most powerful and militant American unions against
a U.S.
imperialist war – this is not just a couple of labor bureaucrats
mouthing empty
phrases at an antiwar rally, dock workers are using their muscle.
Although it
is a “symbolic” action – stopping work for the day shift, on May Day,
the international workers day – the symbolism is not lost on the ruling
class.
It is a warning of big trouble on the home front of their imperialist
war, a
vivid demonstration that American workers have the power to shut down
the war
machine – and that the most militant sectors are ready to use it. Around
the country, a number of labor bodies have endorsed the ILWU action. As
of this
writing, this includes the San Francisco, Alameda County (Oakland) and
King
County (Seattle) Labor Councils, Vermont AFL-CIO, Puerto Rican Teachers
Federation (FMPR), U.S. and NYC Labor Against the War, Oakland and
California
state teachers unions, and others. Postal workers union locals in San
Francisco
and Greensboro, North Carolina (NALC) and in New York (APWU) are going
to stop
work briefly on May 1. At the City University of New York, teach-ins
and
rallies sponsored by chapters of the union of CUNY faculty and staff (PSC) will be held in solidarity with the
ILWU port shutdown. Internationally, the ILWU action has been supported
by the
International Dock Workers Council, the International Transport Workers
Federation, UNITE in Britain, and others. Endorsements
are nice, but action is what’s needed – working-class action –
more
substantial and a lot more of it, and above all independent of the
bosses. What
that takes is a fundamental break from the Democratic Party and the
pro-capitalist politics that infuse the labor bureaucracy. Maritime
Bosses in a Frenzy
The
announcement of the ILWU’s upcoming action caught the attention of some
in the
media. The SF Weekly (12 March) headlined, “ILWU to Shut Down
West Coast
Ports on Socialist Holiday.” The article reported that after heated
discussion,
“Union rank and file took a vote and made it official: During the
eight-hour
day shift on May 1, portside traffic in goods between the U.S. and Asia
will
cease.” The San Francisco Chronicle (9 April) published an
article by
Jack Heyman, the author of the motion that was passed by the union’s
longshore
caucus, who noted: “This
decision came after an impassioned debate where the
union’s Vietnam veterans turned the tide of opinion in favor of the
anti-war
resolution. The motion called it an imperial action for oil in which
the lives
of working-class youth and Iraqi civilians were being wasted and
declared May
Day a ‘no peace, no work’ holiday. Angered after supporting Democrats
who
received a mandate to end the war but who now continue to fund it,
longshoremen
decided to exercise their political power on the docks.” The New York Times
also expressed interest in publishing an article, but rejected it when
it
referred to the 1919 Seattle dock workers’ boycott of U.S. arms being
shipped
to the counterrevolutionary White Armies to fight the Bolsheviks in
Russia. The
prospect of a coast-wide work stoppage has certainly shaken up the
shipping
bosses, particularly coming just as a new contract is being negotiated.
The
Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) notified the union on April 3 that
it
“doesn’t consent to a stop-work meeting or any other effort to disrupt
port
operations.” Subsequently the PMA threatened the union tops with
heavy-duty
court action if they don’t call it all off. The employers are
threatening to
bring down an injunction under the “slave labor” Taft-Hartley Law. The
bosses’
attempt to stop the port shutdown means that a class struggle
is already
being waged over this issue. The
PMA’s move is no idle threat: the feds issued an injunction during the
2002
bargaining, saying that any stoppage was a threat to the war effort.
They could
do it again. If that happens, the dock workers should defy the
labor-hating
government, and all labor must use its muscle to back them up! Can it
be done?
Yes, and the ruling class knows it. An article by Matt Smith in the
on-line
business publication Miller-McCune (9 April) expressed
amazement that,
“Would you believe...blue-collar dock workers” could “bring down the
economy.”
Smith explained: “The
ILWU, which represents 25,000 dockworkers at 29
Pacific coast ports, is simultaneously the most politically radical,
materially
comfortable and economically significant group of U.S. workers.... “The
union’s industrial might has its roots in a 1930s San
Francisco general strike that created one of the most politically
radical,
democratically run and impenetrably unified American labor
syndicates.... “The
union and shippers are already butting heads over
ILWU plans to shut down all West Coast ports May 1 in protest against
the wars
in Iraq and Afghanistan. The idea was to exploit a work rule allowing
the union
to request a day off for a local shop meeting, by requesting
simultaneous days
off at every port. The shippers refused. And now the ILWU is poised to
conduct
the equivalent of a one-day walkout.” In response to the
threats, the author quoted a union spokesman saying nobody was
intimidated: “‘For
us, folks aren’t going to be working on May 1.
Everybody here’s clear about that,’ said ILWU Communications Director
Craig
Merrilees.” The maritime employers
are particularly worried because bargaining is underway on the union
contract.
The article quoted a Berkeley economist saying that a dock strike could
produce
“a chain reaction that’s really rather a nightmare.... This affects the
whole
economy very broadly and very quickly.” Earlier,
another business publication, the CalTrade Report (14 March)
tried some
old-style red-baiting in a front-page article with a subhead declaring:
“US
West Coast action called to protest ‘imperialist’ war in Iraq,
Afghanistan” The
article declared: “A
number of organizations including The Internationalist
Group-League for the Fourth International, a New York-based Marxist
activist
group, have voiced their support for the ILWU action. “According
to a story on the front page of the
organization’s website – www.internationalist.org, ‘This is the first
time in
decades that an American union has decided to undertake industrial
action
against a US war.’ “The
action, it continues, ‘should be taken up by unions
and labor organizations throughout the United States and
internationally…and
the purpose of such actions should be not to beg the bourgeois
politicians
whose hands are covered with blood, having voted for every war budget
for six
and a half years, but a show of strength of the working people who make
this
country run, and who can shut it down!’” The smear tactics went
nowhere. Despite the hyperventilation in the trade papers, the union
has stood
its ground. Break with the
Democrats – Build a
Class-Struggle Workers Party!
But
the battle over the antiwar port shutdown is far from over, including
inside
the ILWU. As we reported earlier, the union’s International leadership
initially tried to divert the call for an antiwar work stoppage, as it
has done
before and just as it buried Local 10’s call to stop work and march for
immigrant rights last May 1. Having failed to “deep-six” the
resolution, the
union tops are now trying to present it in a “social-patriotic” light.
Writing
to AFL-CIO president John Sweeney, ILWU president Robert Ellrath said
the
action was called to “express support for the troops by bringing them
home
safely.” This phrase was highlighted in the official union
announcement.
Meanwhile, the union Executive Board has endorsed Democrat Barack Obama
for
president. In
fact, the resolution passed by the Longshore Caucus has none of these
social-patriotic appeals, and it explicitly attacks the “bipartisan and
unjustifiable war in Iraq and Afghanistan” which “Democrats and
Republicans
continue to fund.” Wrapping themselves in the American flag, the
bureaucrats
are playing the game of the warmongers in Washington. All the talk of
“supporting
the troops” coming out of the “antiwar movement” is a loyalty oath:
they’re
saying they oppose the (losing) war in Iraq, but they still salute the
flag of
U.S. imperialism. Similarly, slogans calling for “jobs not war,” “books
not
bombs,” etc., pose opposition to the war as a question of priorities.
Yet if there was no U.S. war in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Colombia and
the
Philippines, and if there were no U.S. troops in the more than 700 U.S.
bases
in 130 countries around the world, the U.S. capitalist rulers still
would
not provide jobs or books or healthcare. It’s
not about foreign policies or budget priorities, it’s
about the
imperialist system that produces one war after another as the
U.S. seeks
to nail down its current position as the “sole superpower” in the
post-Soviet
world. The whole “war on terror” is a war for U.S. world domination.
It’s the
lead-up to a new world war in which the “enemy” is not a Saddam Hussein
or some
other tin-pot dictator but the U.S.’ imperialist “allies” and rivals.
The
Democrats are 110 percent for that war – they just think, as Obama
said, that
Iraq is “the wrong war.” And their “right” war “against terror” – to
terrorize
the world into submission – hits longshore workers directly, through
the
Transport Workers Identification Card. The TWIC is being pushed in
particular
by the Democrats, and its introduction will bring a racial purge on the
docks. Democratic
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton remarked a few weeks ago, in
response to
claims by President George Bush and Republican candidate John McCain
that
withdrawal from Iraq would be a defeat: “Well, let’s be clear,
withdrawal is
not defeat. Defeat is keeping troops in Iraq for 100 years. Defeat is
straining
our alliances and losing our standing in the world. Defeat is draining
our
resources and diverting attention from our key interests’” (Boston
Globe,
18 March). Clinton wants to withdraw (some of the) U.S. troops,
precisely in
order to avoid a defeat for U.S. imperialism. For his
part,
Barack Obama has said that he would leave residual troops in Iraq among
other
things to “fight terrorism,” that he wants to up U.S. troop levels in
Afghanistan, and that the U.S. should launch missile strikes on targets
in Iran
and Pakistan. The ILWU leaders’ endorsement of Obama hurts rather than
helps
the struggle against imperialist war and undercuts the May 1 work
stoppage. The
capitalist parties also include the Greens, who ran immigrant-basher
Ralph
Nader for president in 2000. In 2004 they were on the ballot only in
“safe”
states so as not to hurt the chances of Democrat John Kerry. The likely
Green
presidential candidate this time around is Cynthia McKinney. McKinney
for 12
years was a Democratic Congresswoman from Georgia, joining the Green
Party only
after she lost in a primary election due to a Republican crossover
vote. She
has denounced the U.S.’ criminal response to Hurricane Katrina, in
which
100,000 overwhelmingly poor and black people were left to die in the
flood. She
was one of three members of the House of Representatives to vote for a
2005
resolution for immediate withdrawal from Iraq, and she has recently
endorsed
the ILWU call for a work stoppage against the war. But she emphasized
that she
was for an “orderly withdrawal,” that she wants to “support the troops
by
bringing them home,” and her politics are vintage Democratic
liberalism.
Explaining her switch to the Greens, she said: “I had a place to go
when the
Democratic Party left me.” Exactly. The red, white and blue Greens are
nothing
but a home for homeless Democrats. In
order to defeat the imperialist war abroad and the bosses’ war
“at
home,” class-conscious workers must oppose all the capitalist
parties
and politicians, and build a class-struggle workers party.
Revolutionaries fight to drive the U.S. out of Iraq and
Afghanistan
– which will be anything but orderly, as the U.S.’ exit from Vietnam
showed –
by workers action . We would like to see the “diplomats” (spies) and
“contractors” (mercenaries) clambering onto the roof of the U.S.
embassy
desperately trying to helicopter out of the “Green Zone” in Baghdad. A
defeat
there would put a damper on U.S. imperial adventures around the world,
and
would aid the struggle of working people, immigrants and oppressed
minorities
in the United States itself. The drawn-out U.S. defeat in Vietnam set
the
climate in which women made many gains including the right to abortion,
and the
racist death penalty was (temporarily) suspended. U.S. rulers gave in
on these
issues because they were afraid the entire country could blow. Fighting
for workers action against the war and against all the capitalist war
parties
is a key way to break the political stranglehold of the captains of
industry
and their labor lieutenants. The ILWU port shutdown can and should be a
catalyst for such action. ■
To
contact the League for the
Fourth
International or its sections,
send an e-mail to: internationalistgroup@msn.com
|