June 2020
Why Cops
and Their “Unions”
Have No Place in the Labor Movement
Class Struggle Workers – Portland at protest against
Minneapolis police murder of George Floyd, May 31.
(CSWP)
This article originally appeared at Talking
Points Memo.
By Becca Lewis
Amidst nationwide protests ignited by the racist police
murder of George Floyd, union members everywhere are
asking: how can labor throw its weight into the fight to
uproot racist repression?
Using our collective power as workers is key. The
multiracial working class makes the country’s wheels turn,
and can bring them to a halt just as quickly. We have the
power to shut down factories and docks, farms and urban
transport, food plants and phone service. And now is the
time to use it.
But it’s also high time the labor movement cleans its own
house. In fact, it’s long overdue. As mass anger at police
killings shines the spotlight on police forces’ role as
enforcers of racist repression, the time is now to carry
through the demand long raised by class-struggle
unionists, summed up in the slogan: “Cops out of the
unions.”
In the weeks since Minneapolis police murdered George
Floyd, cops have responded to mass protests by unleashing
more violence on protesters. Yet brutal attacks by police
across the country have not stifled the voices of
millions. As we march, we chant to remember and honor
those, like George Floyd, whose lives were cut short by
endless racist terror.
Breonna Taylor, shot dead as she slept in her bed in
Louisville.
Jamel
Floyd died in New York after guards
pepper-sprayed him in his prison cell.
Derrick
Scott in Oklahoma City, who – like Eric Garner
and George Floyd – died saying, “I can’t breathe.” One of
the cops holding him down responded: “I don’t care.”
Here in Portland, Oregon, we remember Jason
Washington, a member of the National Association of
Letter Carriers, shot dead by university police.
Sean
Reed, Ahmaud
Arbery, Philando
Castile, Sandra
Bland…
And in recent days, we learned Atlanta police shot and
killed a 27-year-old black man named Rayshard
Brooks.
Juneteenth: 19 June 2020, at rally in Oakland, California
in conjunction with the shutdown of all U.S. West Coast
ports by the International Longshore and Warehouse Union
(ILWU) in protest against racist police brutality.
(Internationalist photo)
As the list keeps growing, we in labor’s ranks join
millions searching for an answer to how and when police
killings and brutality will end. Workers like me want
police “unions” ousted from the labor movement and want
cops of all kinds removed from unions and union bodies
now: this will be a crucial part of unchaining labor’s
power in the fight against racial oppression.
The fact is, we face a glaring contradiction with the
inclusion of police in the labor movement. The struggle
against racist oppression is crucial to labor’s cause, but
the professionals of repression are included in one labor
body after another. Freeing labor from any and all
affiliation with the cops is crucial to the revitalization
of unions, which is a matter of life or death for the
labor movement. Yet despite recent efforts by the Writers
Guild of America, East and others to rightly
call for the expulsion of the International Union of
Police Associations from the AFL-CIO, the push has been
met with resistance – the AFL-CIO rejected WGAE’s call
earlier this month. When members of the labor officialdom
try to stop or divert this vital fight, they are wielding
the very outlook and policies that have drastically
undercut and weakened our movement for years.
We must resolve this contradiction now if labor is
genuinely going to unite with the aspirations of a new
generation of workers who want to uproot racism – and if
the labor movement is going to transform itself into an
instrument for the emancipation of the working class and
the oppressed.
As a longtime union activist here in the Pacific
Northwest – a region plagued by far-right and
white-supremacist forces, as well as attempts to impose
union-busting “right-to-work” laws – the fight to oust
cops from the unions is linked to all of our efforts to
put workers’ solidarity into practice. When trade
unionists here mobilize against racist attacks and
provocations by far-right and fascist groups, police use
the tools of their trade – batons, teargas, flash-bang
grenades and pepper balls – to repress the anti-racist
protesters.
A vivid example occurred in 2017 after a local
fascist stabbed to death two people who opposed his
racist rampage against teenage African American women on
the MAX light rail train. Days after the attack, far-right
groups staged
a dangerous provocation in our city. Portland
Labor Against the Fascists brought out members of 14
unions to stop it. As has repeatedly occurred, a year
after the incident, Portland
police were caught coordinating with the
far-right groups holding a similar rally. The police
encouraged the far-right provocations and provided some of
those carrying them out with escorts and transport.
Today in Portland, as elsewhere, many of our fellow
unionists who work in media have taken to removing logos
from their clothing and cameras while covering protests
because — like legal observers dragged off to jail when
cops yell “round
up the green hats” — journalists have been
targeted by the police.
Labor playing the role it must in the fight against
racist repression is flatly counterposed to harboring
organizations whose purpose is to push the claims, and
shield the crimes, of the police. And that is precisely
what cops’ so-called
“unions” are all about. When Minneapolis banned
“warrior training” for cops last year, the police “union”
even announced that
it would provide such training for free.
While labor bodies like WGAE push for disaffiliation with
the International Union of Police Associations, the effort
is just one drop in one very large bucket. IUPA is just
one of the entities representing the demands and interests
of the repressors in blue. “We have a dozen affiliate
unions that represent law enforcement in some form,” the
AFL-CIO Executive Council noted in its June 10 statement
opposing WGEA’s demand. Instead, it’s calling for police
groups to adopt a “code of excellence.” This would be the
equivalent of cops
taking a knee before they go out yet again to bust heads
and round up anti-racist protesters.
While police associations are not workers unions, many
actual unions (AFSCME, the CWA, SEIU, Teamsters and
others) have brought “law enforcement” and
repression-industry sectors into their ranks. Having
professional strikebreakers in the unions — when unionists
face repression from cops and guards in every strike — is
a recipe for defeat.
Class Struggle Workers – Portland at anti-racist protest
called by IBEW Local 48, June 18. (CSWP)
The AFL-CIO leadership’s position would only discredit
unions in the eyes of a new generation that must be won
over to the cause and struggle of labor. And it delivers a
slap in the face to countless unionists subjected to
police violence, teargas and sonic weapons for protesting
racism or standing on a picket line. The officialdom
claims that maintaining the affiliation of police is a
question of – wait for it – “unity.” Cops’
billy clubs may “unite” with our heads, but real unity of
workers, against racist repression, means uncuffing labor
from “unity” with those swinging the batons.
The shopworn claim that it’s just a “few bad apples”
involved in police brutality across the U.S. is starkly
exposed by current events. When police terrorize black
communities, target protesters and break up union pickets,
they are literally doing their job — a role integral to
the profit system, in which racial oppression has always
been key to capitalists’ wealth and power. There is no
reform or code, no set of rules or oversight that can
change the basic role of the police, and they don’t belong
in our unions in any form.
Just digging into the history of the police in America,
which began as slave
patrols, reveals how central it has always been to
racial oppression.
After the Civil War, the promise of black freedom through
Reconstruction was betrayed. As industry grew, labor —
both black and white — faced bloody police intervention.
As black workers took the lead in bringing the 1877 labor upheaval into the
South, the cops were there to bloodily
break up interracial workers’ struggles. When Democratic
Party “Redeemers” imposed Jim Crow, the cops were
there to enforce “law and order.” Up North, police joined
post-WWI pogroms against black communities, while police
frame-ups and vigilante lynchers took the lives of
immigrant workers like Sacco
and Vanzetti, IWW bard Joe Hill, his Native American
comrade Frank Little and innumerable other heroes of
labor.
Down the decades, from police massacres of striking
dock workers in San Francisco and “Little
Steel” strikers in Chicago, to the police murder of
black teenager Larry
Payne in the 1968 Memphis Sanitation Strike to
today, strike-breaking and racist repression are central
to the history of labor struggle, and of the police.
When police aren’t enough, companies rely on assistance
from security guards like the Pinkertons (currently known
as Securitas Security Services), infamous
for strike-breaking as “just part of the job” of
protecting capitalist property and making sure that bosses
can keep unions in check.
On June 2, Minneapolis Public Schools voted to cut ties
with the police department. This important step should
spread to other cities. And it means opposing any attempts
to replace them with private security guards or some other
police department, which would mean more of the same.
Today, all labor faces the old question: Which side are
you on?
When painters, construction workers, stage hands and
others formed Class Struggle Workers – Portland six years
ago, we saw the need to end labor’s subjugation to the
bosses’ institutions, politicians and parties, and for
building a workers’ party. One of our key inspirations was
black and white unionists’ struggle to oust police from
the municipal workers union in Brazil’s “Steel
City.” Our founding program states: “Police,
prison guards and security guards are the armed fist of
capital, part of the apparatus of anti-labor, racist
repression: they must be removed from the unions.”
To unchain the power of labor in the fight against racism
and repression, this contradiction must be resolved.
If not now, when?
Becca Lewis is a member of the IATSE L.
28 union and a founding member of Class Struggle Workers
– Portland.
Return to THE
INTERNATIONALIST GROUP Home Page
|