Labor's Gotta Play Hardball to Win!
Showdown on West Coast Docks: The Battle
of Longview
(November 2011).
click on photo for article
Chicago Plant Occupation Electrifies Labor
(December 2008).
click on photo for article
May Day Strike Against the War Shuts
Down
U.S. West Coast Ports
(May 2008)
click on photo for article
|
April 2017
Mobilize Labor’s
Power to Bust the Union-Busters!
It Will Take Hard Class Struggle
to Defeat “Right to Work”
Union militants picket outside event of the Freedom
Foundation, which is pushing for a slave labor
“right-to-work” law in Oregon, 24 June 2016. (Photo: Class Struggle Workers –
Portland )
The following article is reprinted from Bridge
City Militant No. 4 (Spring 2017), published by Class
Struggle Workers – Portland, a union tendency that works
fraternally with the Internationalist Group. To learn
out more about the CSWP go to its web site, https://csw-pdx.org/.
The labor movement in the United States is under
full-scale attack, and its leaders are lying down and
playing dead. They have no plans to fight the rightist
capitalist onslaught spearheaded by Donald Trump. Worse
yet, having been burned by their support for Democrat
Hillary Clinton, the professional defender of Wall Street
who didn’t even bother to go through the motions of
pretending be a “friend of labor,” and whose economic
policies have led to the destruction of hundreds of
thousands of union jobs, top labor leaders are doing
everything they can to play ball with labor-hater Trump.
In an interview with Fox Business Network, AFL-CIO
president Richard Trumka praised Trump’s cancellation of
the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal and his talk of
rebuilding infrastructure. “If he does something that’s
good for the economy and workers, we’re going to be behind
him,” he summed up, adding lamely: if not, not. Others
were totally positive. When Trump called construction
union leaders to the White House in late January, the head
of NABTU (North America’s Building Trades Unions) Sean
McGarvey crowed, “The respect that the
President of the United States just showed us… was nothing
short of incredible…. We have a common bond with the
president.”
Laborers’ International Union president Terry O’Sullivan
issued a press release saying “LIUNA is ready to work with
the new Administration in the coming years to strengthen
our country.” Doug McCarron, president of the
International Brotherhood of Carpenters, was downright
fawning. After Trump declared “I love Doug,” McCarron
gushed to the media that the president’s inaugural speech
was “a great moment for working men and women in the
United States.” But behind the love fest, working people
will get screwed by a president who has declared that
wages in the U.S. are too high, has fought unions at his
Las Vegas hotel and elsewhere, and supports union-busting
“right-to-work” laws.
Various commentators have argued that the construction
union leaders are being played. For sure. But then they
are also being played when they regularly back the
Democrats. Labor will always get screwed so long as it is
chained to the parties of capital. But forging those
chains is how the sellout labor bureaucrats got in office,
and how they got where they are today: facing the abyss.
The paralysis of union tops in the face of threatened
“right-to-work” legislation, or a potential Supreme Court
decision that would do the same to public sector workers,
is a declaration of bankruptcy. It demonstrates again that
their fundamental loyalty is to the capitalist system, not
the working people they claim to represent. What’s needed
is to build a fighting opposition inside the labor
movement based on a program of sharp class struggle,
against the suicidal class collaboration of the present
pro-capitalist labor bureaucracy. There’s got to be a
clean sweep, or the unions are going down.
“Right to Work” and Racist American
Capitalism
A year ago, labor unionists breathed a sigh of relief as
the U.S. Supreme Court, by a 4-4 tie vote, killed Friedrichs
v. California Teachers Association by letting stand
the ruling of the appeals court. Funded by deep-pocketed
anti-union “think tanks,” the lawsuit sought to cripple
the unions financially by outlawing the “agency shop,” the
requirement that employees at an organized workplace pay
union dues or an equivalent. The target was public sector
unions (representing 35% of the workforce) which because
of their political connections have been able to withstand
the union-busting onslaught that has decimated labor in
the private sector, where union membership is down to 6%.
Now anti-union forces are gearing up for another
attempt. They are pushing ultra-rightist corporate stooge
Neil Gorsuch – whose CV includes “joking” in his elite
Jesuit Georgetown Prep boarding school yearbook of
founding a “Fascism Forever” club – for Supreme Court
justice. If Gorsuch survives the Democrats’ softball
“questions” and impotent filibustering to win
confirmation, ensuring a hard anti-union Court majority,
the Supremes may soon have another Friedrichs
case, namely Janus v. AFSCME from Illinois, which
is being pushed by the National Right to Work Foundation.
Meanwhile, in January Kentucky enacted a double-whammy
“right-to-work” law coupled with a “no-right-to-strike”
provision for public employees. Missouri passed its “RTW”
law in February (it already had a public sector strike
ban). And on February 1, a bill for a National Right to
Work Act was introduced in the U.S. House of
Representatives by two of the most reactionary congressmen
in the country, Steve King of Iowa and Joe Wilson of South
Carolina. If neither of them is formally part of the
right-wing Republican Freedom Caucus it is because this
pair stands even further to the right.
Wilson is a Tea Party asset and a virulent
immigrant-basher whose main claim to fame was to yell “you
lie” (about immigration reform) at Barack Obama during a
2009 presidential address in Congress. Steve King is, if
anything, an even more unabashed racist, sporting a
Confederate battle flag on his desk, claiming Obama
favored blacks and saying that “white people” have a
“superior culture.” He declares that Islam is
“antithetical to Americanism,” says that “we can’t restore
our civilization with somebody else’s babies,” and wants
to eliminate citizenship for all children of undocumented
immigrants born in the U.S. in order to produce an
“America that’s just so homogenous that we look a lot
[sic] the same.”
It’s no wonder that spewing out such garbage, King
is a hero of fascist and fascistic “white nationalists.”
He is not only opposed to gay marriage, but even to civil
marriage. And its entirely predictable that such a
race-hater would also be a labor-hater. The fact is that
the campaign for open-shop “right to work” laws, now
threatening a nationwide offensive, was championed from
its beginning by racist ideologues who oppose unions
because in order to be effective, the unions must organize
black and white workers together.
“Right to work” as a deceptively-named political movement
was launched in the 1940s in Texas by a prolific
right-wing political organizer named Vance Muse. Muse’s modus
operandi was to rake in funds from some of America’s
most powerful capitalist families – the Sloans (General
Motors), Pews (Sun Oil), and Duponts, along with leading
Southern grandees – while hobnobbing with fascist groups
like the Klan and “Silver Shirt” leader Gerald L. K.
Smith. Muse organized a Georgia convention of a “Southern
Committee to Uphold the Constitution” in 1934 chaired by
former National Association of Manufacturers president
John H. Kirby and featuring Smith and other fascists.
Two years later, Muse launched the Christian American
Association in Texas. According to the Texas State
Historical Association’s Handbook of Texas Online,
“The Christian Americans worked for passage of
right-to-work laws in sixteen states,” starting with
Florida and Arkansas. According to “Limiting Labor:
Business Political Mobilization and Union Setback in the
States” by Marc Dixon in the Journal of Policy History
(Vol. 19, No. 3, 2007):
“The Christian American Association was the
first in the nation to champion the ‘Right-to-Work’ as a
full-blown political slogan. Vance Muse became intrigued
by the use of the Right-to-Work term in a 1941 Labor Day
editorial in the Dallas Morning News that called
for an open-shop amendment to the constitution. After
traveling to Dallas and consulting with the editor, Muse
was encouraged to use and promote the idea of
Right-to-Work. This became their primary cause and they
campaigned extensively for Right-to-Work legislation
throughout the country, and especially within Texas.”
Muse and the fascist forces he mobilized with industry
backing opposed unions because, in Muse’s words, the
agency shop meant that “from now on, white women and white
men will be forced into organizations with black African
apes whom they will have to call ‘brother’ or lose their
jobs” (Gerard Colby, Du Pont Dynasty: Behind the Nylon
Curtain [1984]). Muse was joined in his efforts by
his older sister Ida Darden, who was notable as the
publicity director of the Texas Association Opposed to
Woman Suffrage in 1916, and the editor of the Southern
Conservativenewspaper from 1950 to 1961, which
campaigned against unions, civil rights, modern art and
Hollywood movies.
Christian American lobbying led to laws in Texas
limiting picketing and other union activities. But while
far-right and fascist organizations such as Muse’s groups
were early and strident advocates of open-shop laws, they
were not alone. Dixon writes that by 1947, when “right to
work” was made law in Texas, its major backer was the
Texas Manufacturers Association, headed by Herman Brown of
the Brown & Root construction firm. By this time, the
TMA kept its distance from Vance Muse and allied far-right
groups. And the anti-labor forces were not the only ones
to make racist appeals. In opposing “open shop” laws,
Harry Acreman of the Texas AFL “invoked race as an issue,
arguing that Right to Work would end segregation in
southern workplaces,” as Dixon noted.
The fact is that ever since Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1930s
New Deal, labor officialdom has been in the Democrats’
pocket. While the Republicans opposed unions outright, FDR
sought to hogtie them with government control, from the
1934 Wagner Act to the WWII War Labor Board. The kept
labor bureaucracy went along with its wartime no-strike
pledge, while the government jailed the Minneapolis
Teamster leaders and Trotskyists for opposing the
imperialist slaughter. Since a mainstay of FDR’s “New Deal
coalition” was the Southern Dixiecrats, in opposing
anti-labor legislation the craven union misleaders
appealed to these racists for support. That doomed the
postwar attempt to organize the South (Operation Dixie),
which could have succeeded had the CIO fought Jim Crow
segregation.
That was when employers’ “right-to-work” drive could have
been stopped cold. Instead, you got the “open shop” South,
a bastion of anti-unionism. And under the Democratic
administration of Harry Truman, the 1948 Taft-Hartley Act
was passed outlawing the closed shop and banning
communists from union leadership positions. Although the
AFL and CIO tops claimed to oppose that “slave-labor” law,
they refused to strike against it, meekly submitting to
the dictates of capital. Meanwhile, as part of the
anti-Soviet Cold War, liberal Democrats purged the unions
of the “reds” who had built them, laying the basis for the
subsequent witchhunting associated with Republican senator
Joseph McCarthy. And McCarthy’s chief witch-hunter, Roy
Cohn, was the mentor of Donald Trump.
Forge a Class-Struggle Leadership
of Labor to Defend All the Oppressed
Today, the drive to roll back the remaining gains of the
industrial unions that were born in the class struggles of
the 1930s is intensifying in the context of a political
crisis of U.S. imperialism. A bogus “democracy” elevates a
fake-populist billionaire and woman-hating media
personality into the Oval Office. Once ensconced, Donald
Trump promises a skeptical Wall Street (which considers
him unreliable and favored Democrat Hillary Clinton)
mountains of golden loot from the federal treasury, while
throwing a few crumbs to some gullible labor fakers. His
arch-racist attorney general Jeff Sessions vows to ratchet
up police repression. And whipping up anti-immigrant
hysteria, he reinforces the key structural element of
American capitalism since it was founded on chattel
slavery: the division of American workers along race-color
lines and the brutal racial oppression of black people.
So how do the AFL-CIO leaders plan to fight the threat
of national “right-to-work” legislation or court-ordered
“open shop” rules that would cripple unions? Answer: they
don’t. There are no plans for mass mobilization, besieging
Congress and the Supreme Court or jamming Wall Street to
shut down the center of world financial capital. At most
they talk of stepping up “education” campaigns to convince
workers to join the union. Even at that level union
leaders remain beholden to the bosses, relying on dues
check-offs which give management the power to turn off the
financial spigot whenever it wants. In New York City, the
United Federation of Teachers won’t get union dues
subtracted from salaries in January until March. A
class-struggle leadership would collect the dues itself.
The only way to defeat this anti-labor onslaught is not
to seek a new “New Deal Coalition” that would continue to
subordinate the working class to one party of racist U.S.
imperialism, but to drive out the pro-capitalist
bureaucracy that chains the unions to the Democrats and
forge a class-struggle leadership of labor that defends
all those oppressed by capitalism.
In the Pacific Northwest, union militants of Class
Struggle Workers – Portland (CSWP), politically supported
by the Internationalist Group, have played a leading role
fighting the threat of “right-to-work” union-busting. In
September 2013, Wyatt McMinn, vice president of Local 10
of the International Union of Printers and Allied Trades
(IUPAT) and a CSWP spokesman was arrested and threatened
with a year in jail for protesting a meeting of the
union-hating Freedom Foundation (see “Defend
Wyatt McMinn, Defeat ‘Right to Slave’,” The
Internationalist No. 36, January-February 2014). The
class-struggle unionist, a founder of the CSWP, was
eventually found not-guilty, a victory for labor
solidarity and the more than a dozen union and labor
councils that endorsed his defense (see “Wyatt
McMinn Not Guilty!” The Internationalist,
June 2014).
Two years later, in the fall of 2015, as Friedrichs
loomed at the Supreme Court, members of Class Struggle
Workers – Portland, elected from their unions as delegates
to the Oregon state AFL-CIO convention, brought a motion
that “area unions should prepare a major region-wide
stop-work action against this effort to impoverish
workers.” The resolution won significant support but was
shot down by the state AFL leadership, which has
repeatedly refused to fight union-busting with industrial
action, instead devoting itself to lobbying Democrats. One
of their main arguments is that opinion polls show “the
public” as being hostile to unions. But as the experience
of the 2011 labor uprising in Wisconsin against an
anti-labor governor showed, once unions began acting like
defenders of workers, public support soared … and then
plummeted when protests were called off in favor of voting
for Democrats.
As CSWP militants wrote in Bridge City Militant
No. 2 (Winter 2016):
“Above all, every union needs to begin preparing
to fight the coming union-busting onslaught in the streets
and in the workplaces. We need to form committees in every
local and every workplace to prepare to tie up metro
Portland like the workers in Wisconsin shut down Madison
in 2011 – but Wisconsin shows that we can’t let the fight
be diverted into the dead end of electoral support for the
Democrats or any capitalist party. We need a
class-struggle workers party: not just a vote-getting
apparatus but a party to organize and lead the fight for
the oppressed and exploited, using the powerful weapons
that our class has.”
The AFL-CIO tops went on to throw millions of dollars to
Hillary Clinton and her pro-“right-to-work”
vice-presidential candidate Tim Kaine. This set the stage
for a demagogue like Donald Trump to reap protest votes
from workers and the unemployed suffering the ravages of
the capitalist economic crisis, and the bipartisan
job-killing policies implemented by Obama that have
devastated the industrial “rust belt.” Class-struggle
unionists called instead to break the Democrats’
stranglehold on labor, and in August 2016 Painters Local
10 passed a groundbreaking resolution calling for “No
Support to the Democrats, Republicans, Or Any Party of the
Bosses,” and instead “call[ing] on the labor movement to
break from the Democratic Party, and build a
class-struggle workers party.” This, and not
belly-crawling before Congress, the courts and the
capitalist politicians, is the way to bust the
union-busters! ■
|