. |
June 2009 Mobilize the Workers To
Defeat the Putsch!
Honduras: Coup d’État in the Maquiladora Republic Down with the reactionary coup! Honduran civilians defending the referendum confront the military putschists in the streets of Tegucigalpa, June 28 (Photo: Orlando Sierra/AFP) Yankee
Imperialism, Hands Off!
For a Federation of Workers Republics of Central America! JUNE 29 – In the early
morning of Sunday, June 28, some 200 soldiers of the Honduran army
kidnapped
the president of the republic, Manuel Zelaya Rosales, at gunpoint and
expelled
him to Costa Rica. Soon after, strategic points of the capital,
Tegucigalpa,
and the main commercial center, San Pedro Sula, were occupied by
armored personnel
carriers. With General Romeo Vásquez (who had been removed by
Zelaya as armed
forces chief) at the head of the military, and with the backing of the
Supreme
Court, the oligarchical Congress named the vice president of the House
of
Deputies as puppet president. This was how the coup played out, the
first in
the region since the genocidal murderer Efraín Ríos Montt
seized Guatemala in
1982 at the height of the anti-Soviet Cold War. This first coup of
the presidency of Barack Obama awakened fears of a return to the days
of the gorilas (ultra-rightist military thugs)
and the “years of blood,” when Honduras served as a launching pad for
the
Nicaraguan contras and the Salvadoran
death squads which sowed terror throughout Central America. There was a quick but weak
response from the population: by mid-morning, several hundred
supporters of
Zelaya surrounded the APCs, braving the gun barrels and burning tires
to block
the streets. The teachers union called an unlimited strike. In the
afternoon up
to 20,000 workers and residents congregated in front of the occupied
Presidential House, but they dispersed after a downpour. Military
roadblocks on
the highways prevented more from arriving. At the diplomatic level, the
U.S.
president expressed “deep concern” over the coup, while Secretary of
State
Hillary Clinton “condemned” it. The United Nations, the Organization of
American States, the Rio Group, the Mercosur (South American Common
Market) and
other organizations of Latin American governments likewise opposed it.
The
Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA), a group of reputedly
“progressive”
countries led by Venezuela and including Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador and
Nicaragua –
which Honduras joined last year – met in Managua, Nicaragua. Venezuelan
president
Hugo Chávez announced that he would “overthrow” the putschists. Coup
leader General
Romeo Vásquez was trained in the U.S. Army's School of the
Americas. But in the concrete, all
this has so far had no effect whatever, and the army is still in
control of
Honduras. Revolutionary Marxists stress that this is a class
question: to defeat the coup we can only count on mobilizing
the working people, in Honduras as well as throughout Central America,
in
Mexico and the rest of the continent. Nothing will be resolved by
simply
reinstalling Zelaya in the presidential seat while the authors of the
coup and
the bankers and landowners who instigated it remain in place. It will
only be a
matter of time until there is a new takeover attempt. It is the
bourgeoisie
itself that overthrew the president, fearing that he was “playing with
fire” by
making too many concessions to those that they ruthlessly exploit. Moreover, the Honduran army
doesn’t move a finger without the Pentagon and the CIA knowing about
it. As
protesters chanted, correctly and insistently, at a demonstration of
some 150
people in New York on Monday, June 29, “Ejército
golpista, instrumento imperialista” (the coup-plotting army is an
instrument of imperialism). And don’t doubt for a minute that the top
bosses of
regional ultra-rightists are involved in the affair. The only way to
sweep away
the coup plotters is by workers
revolution throughout the region, extending into the heart of the
empire,
the United States. In contrast to this view,
bourgeois liberals and petty-bourgeois reformist leftists see the
matter as a
question of “democracy” vs. “dictatorship,” and from this standpoint
they feed
illusions in the new U.S. president. Some are even calling on the Obama
administration to reinstall the deposed Honduran president in the
Presidential
House. Among them is President Zelaya himself. In an interview with the
Madrid
(Spain) daily El País (29 June), the
Honduran leader remarked a day before the coup: “Everything was ready here
to carry out a coup, and if the U.S. Embassy had approved, there would
have
been a coup.... If I am sitting here right now speaking with you in the
Presidential House, it is thanks to the United States.” But a few short hours
later, he was no longer sitting in the Presidential House. If the U.S.
had
really wanted to prevent the overthrow, the coup plotters would never
have dared
to carry it out, or they would long since be gone. The reality is that,
at the
very least, Washington is tolerating the
coup. But watch out for imperialists who undo coups d’état:
they can also orchestrate
them! After vituperating for
years against the awful president Bush, even comparing him with Satan,
many now
think that with the election of Barack Obama it’s back to the times
when the
U.S. was a “Good Neighbor,” like under Franklin Delano Roosevelt. They
forget
that under FDR, occupation by the Marines was replaced by installing
puppet
dictators in the Dominican Republic (Trujillo) and Nicaragua (Somoza).
Honduras
under strong man Tuburcio Carías became the quintessential
“banana republic,”
as he ruled the country from 1932 to 1948 in the interests of the
United Fruit
Company, known throughout Latin America as El
Pulpo (the Octopus, whose tentacles reached everywhere). But
despite his
replacement after World War II by the “democratic” government of Juan
Manuel
Gálvez, anti-working-class repression continued ... and
imperialist
intervention became even more blatant. This came to a head in the
great banana strike of 1954, when workers on United Fruit plantations,
on its
subsidiary the Tela Railroad Company, as well as Standard Fruit, the
ports and
even Rosario Mining Company all stopped work. Gálvez, a former
lawyer for Tela
Railroad, brought out the army against the strikers. They, however, had
organized a powerful strike committee that resisted the onslaught.
Left-wing
newspapers such as Vanguardia Revolucionaria and Voz Obrera (Workers Voice) circulated
widely. As Ramón Amaya Amador, the novelist of the Honduran
working class,
wrote in his novel Destacamento Rojo
(Red Detachment): “He brought to their
attention the formation of study groups on Marxism and the problems of
the
countryside which opened them up to the revolutionary ideology of the
working
class.... Union organization was spreading, which the government fought
against
declaring that these were subversive activities by loafers set on
disrupting
social peace, anarchists who recognized neither god nor the law. They
waved the
anti-communist flag, applying heavy sanctions against anyone who talked
about
organizing the workers.” When troops and anti-communist
propaganda proved insufficient to defeat the strike, the government
appealed to
its “Good Neighbor” to the north. This was taking place just as the
U.S. was
intervening next door in Guatemala, by means of a secret army trained
on
Honduran soil. Once their subversive work in Guatemala was
accomplished,
Washington dispatched some “labor advisors” to Honduras to attack the
“reds”
from within, by forming parallel “unions” which broke up the strike.
“Honduras
became the test case for a policy to be used throughout the Third World
in
order to preserve it from communism, for capitalism” (Alison Acker, Honduras: The Making of a Banana Republic [South
End, 1988]). This history of anti-communist union wrecking is described
in
detail in the pamphlet, The AFL-CIO in
Central America (1987), published by the Labor Committee on Central
America. In Central America,
meddling by the “AFL-CIA” has always gone hand in hand with U.S.
military
pressure. Following the overthrow of the Somoza dictatorship in
Nicaragua in
1979, the United States shifted the center of its regional military
activity to
Honduras. They built the enormous military base of Palmerola, which
served as
operations central for the contras
besieging Sandinista Nicaragua, as well as for American “trainers” in
the
Honduran army. Between 1983 and 1987, some 70,000 U.S. military
personnel
passed through the country. Honduras in this period was controlled by
the
American ambassador, John Negroponte, known as the Proconsul, who went
on to
become U.S. ambassador to Iraq under the administration of George Bush
II, and
later Director of National Intelligence of the United States. At this
time as
well, Battalion 316 was formed, a veritable military death squad, which
under
General Álvarez Martínez tortured and murdered hundreds,
if not thousands, of
Honduran activists with the supervision of the CIA and fascistic
“advisors”
from the Argentine military dictatorship. Despite being a small
country, like its neighbor El Salvador, Honduras has been a key piece
in the
strategy of Yankee imperialist domination. And as we have noted, even
though it
is the second poorest country in Latin America (after Haiti), with 80
percent
of the population living in poverty or extreme poverty, Honduras has a
long
history of labor struggle. Today it has ceased to be a banana republic
and has
instead become the country of maquiladoras
(free trade zone factories). In the framework of the Free Trade
Agreement, with
more than 120,000 workers, mainly women, toiling for miserable wages in
conditions of semi-slavery, Honduras is today in third place worldwide
for maquila production. These workers have a
tremendous potential for struggle, but they need the aid of their class
brothers and sisters in the United States and Mexico. There are also
important
unions in Honduras, such as the STIBYS in the bottling plants, which
are part
of the International Union of Food Workers, to which the UFCW in the
U.S. is
affiliated. Honduran president Manuel Zelaya (center) along with his counterparts, Nicaraguan president Daniel Ortega and Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, on arrival in Managua, 28 June. (Photo: EFE) One of the grounds for the
military action ousting President Zelaya was his recent moves toward
Hugo
Chávez’ Venezuela with Honduras’ entry into ALBA last year, and
his visits to
Cuba where he had a friendly chat with Fidel Castro. But the trigger
for
yesterday’s military coup was the holding of a non-binding referendum
on a
constituent assembly, scheduled for that day (June 28). The then-chief
of the
armed forces, Romeo Vásquez, refused to cooperate with the civic
exercise, and
was supported in this by the Supreme Court and the Congress. The bulk
of the
capitalist class feared that such an assembly could undercut their
narrow
domination, and like their counterparts in Bolivia and Ecuador, they
decided to
use every means at their disposal to prevent it. In the latter two
cases, the
reactionaries failed because the population was mobilized. However, in
Honduras
the government of Zelaya, a rancher who was elected in 2005 on the
basis of a
right-wing law-and-order program, has relatively limited roots among
the
working masses. After the coup, several
organizations of workers and peasants mobilized. The Mexican paper La Jornada (29 June) established contact
with various groups of the Civic Council of Popular and Indigenous
Organizations (COPIN). Miskito and Lenca Indians and the Garifuna
population
are also preparing to fight. There is a small liberal party with a
social-democratic tint (the Democratic Unification Party) which
supports
Zelaya. However, Carlos Reyes, the general secretary of the STIBYS
union,
stated before the coup that the workers movement was prepared to
struggle, not
to back Zelaya but to support the right of the population to express
itself
politically: “President
Zelaya received
the direct support of much of his party while the three trade-union
federations
and the Honduran Popular Bloc as well as a whole series of social
organizations
are supporting the referendum on Sunday, not President Zelaya.”
–“Honduras on the Verge of a Coup d’État,” Rel, 27 June There is a readiness to
fight, and distrust of the bourgeois parties as well. But what is
missing is
key: a revolutionary leadership capable of organizing the discontent
and
opposition to the coup among the working people in a powerful class
movement. The League for the Fourth
International, which bases itself on Leon Trotsky’s program of
permanent revolution,
urges workers to fight against the coup while offering no political
support
whatsoever to the right-wing president who for his own reason has
slipped the
leash of his buddies in the Honduran oligarchy. The working class, led
by a
genuinely Leninist vanguard party, must place itself at the head of the
poor
peasants to establish its own class rule with a workers and peasants
government
that expropriates the entire bourgeoisie, the industrialists and the
ranchers,
in order to put an end to the infernal cycle of military coups and
oligarchical
pseudo-democracies that has repeated itself throughout Latin American
history. At the time of
independence, a Federal Republic of Central America was established.
Today we
struggle for a Central American federation of workers republics, as
part of a
Socialist United States of Latin America, in close collaboration with
the North
American working class in the fight for international socialist
revolution. ■ To contact the Internationalist Group and the League for the Fourth International, send e-mail to: internationalistgroup@msn.com |
|