|
. |
|
|
No. 27,
May-June 2008
Table
of Contents
Selected
articles
linked
Click on image to left for
pdf version of complete issue.
|
Historic ILWU Dock
Workers’ Action Points the Way
May Day Strike Against the War Shuts Down
All U.S. West Coast Ports
On
May
1, every port on the West Coast of the
United States was shut down to demand an
end to the U.S. war and occupation of Iraq
and Afghanistan. The historic May Day
walkout by the International Longshore and
Warehouse Union (ILWU) is the first time
ever that an American union has struck
against a U.S. war. The union ranks defied
the rulings of an arbitrator, who twice
ordered them to go to work. They overcame
the capitulations of the ILWU leadership,
which didn’t want the work stoppage in the
first place, tried to water it down
and cowered before the threats of legal
action while waving the flag. The
employers’ Pacific Maritime Association
(PMA) declared the May 1 port shutdown an
“illegal strike.” But after all the
huffing and puffing from the bosses’
mouthpieces, the dock workers pointed the
way to defeating the imperialist war by
mobilizing working-class power. In the
end, it was more than a work stoppage. The
dock workers’ May Day strike against the
war was a first step, a show of what it
will take to bring down the warmongers in
Washington. Their “symbolic” action was
felt all the way to Iraq, where dock
workers in two ports stopped work in
solidarity with the ILWU. But it was only
a beginning. What is needed is not only
industrial action but a political
offensive against the Democrats and
Republicans, the partner parties of
American imperialism, to build a
class-struggle workers party. May Day
Strike Against the War Shuts Down All U.S.
West Coast Ports (3 May 2008)
|
“Workers Vanguard”
Brings Up the Rear
The Opportunist Left and the Port
Strike Against the War: The Sound of One
Hand Clapping
On May Day, ports
up and down the Pacific Coast were shut
down by the International Longshore and
Warehouse Union (ILWU) to demand an end to
“this bloody war and occupation for
imperial domination.” It is the first time
ever that an American union has taken
industrial action against a U.S. war. News
of the ILWU’s strike against the war has
reverberated among labor militants
internationally. While the maritime
employers threatened legal action and
trade papers denounce reds under the beds,
most of the left was notably silent. The
reason: they are part and parcel of the
popular-front antiwar movement,
whose purpose is to pressure
the Democrats, and militant labor action
gets in the way. The Spartacist League for
many years called for workers strikes
against the war, as well as “hot-cargoing”
war materiel. However, as part of its turn
from revolutionary Trotskyism to centrist
opportunism, the SL abandoned these key
programmatic positions, along with its
prior calls to defeat U.S. imperialism.
Meanwhile, it smears the Internationalist
Group for upholding the Trotskyist program
of workers action
against imperialist war. The
Opportunist
Left
and the Port Strike Against the War: The
Sound of One Hand Clapping (15 May 2008)
|
For Workers Strikes Against
the War!
Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants!
All Out on May Day!
On
May
1, all 29 ports on the U.S. West Coast are
to be shut down by the International
Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) in
protest against the U.S. war on
Afghanistan and Iraq. This is a historic
event of international significance: labor
action against imperialist war by a major
American union. The strategically placed
port workers in the ILWU can bring
commerce with Asia to a grinding halt, and
they’re about to demonstrate it. The
maritime employers are already screaming,
and you can bet it’s got the attention of
the warmongers in Washington. All labor
should take up the challenge this poses:
For workers strikes against the war!
Meanwhile, immigrants’ rights groups are
once again mobilizing on May Day. And on
April 30 and May 1, the independent
truckers who move cargo to and from the
docks may play an important role in a
shutdown. The imperialist war on
Afghanistan and Iraq is also a war on
immigrants, minorities, working people and
democratic rights “at home.” We need to
defeat this attack here and abroad, in
opposition to both the capitalist war
parties. The “antiwar movement,” whose aim
has always been to pressure the Democrats,
is at a dead end. What’s needed is
working-class action independent of the
bosses. What that takes is a fundamental
break from the Democratic Party and the
pro-capitalist politics that infuse the
labor bureaucracy. All
Out
on
May Day! (19 April 2008) |
For Workers Strikes Against the
War!
ILWU
to Shut Down West Coast Ports May 1 to
Protest War
In a major step
for the U.S. labor movement, the
International Longshore and Warehouse
Union (ILWU) has announced that it will
shut down West Coast ports on May 1, to
demand an immediate end to the war and
occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the
withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Middle
East. This is the first time in decades
that an American union has decided to
undertake industrial action against a U.S.
war. The action announced by the powerful
West Coast dock workers union, to stop
work to stop the war, should be taken up
by unions and labor organizations
throughout the United States and
internationally. And the purpose of such
actions should be not to beg the bourgeois
politicians whose hands are covered with
blood, having voted for every war budget
for six and a half years, but a show of
strength of the working people who make
this country run, and who can shut it
down! ILWU
to
Shut Down West Coast Ports May 1 to
Protest War (1 March 2008)
|
Why We
Fight for Workers Strikes Against
the War
(and
the Opportunists Don't)
Break with the
Democrats – For a Class-Struggle Workers
Party!
The U.S.’
colonial occupation of, Iraq and Afghanistan
is at a dead end. Despite the vaunted
“surge” of U.S. forces in Iraq last spring,
attacks by insurgents have not diminished
one bit, while the number of Iraqi civilian
casualties has sharply increased. In
the mid-term U.S. elections last November,
the Democrats won control of both houses of
Congress mainly due to the perception that
they would “do something” to end the
war. Yet the war goes on, with their
support. The entire activity of the antiwar
movement has consisted precisely of seeking
to pressure the Democratic Party into
opposing the war on Iraq. Forget it. This is
a bi-partisan imperialist war. The
Internationalist Group and League for the
Fourth International call not just for U.S.
withdrawal, which would merely lead to the
next war as it has repeatedly over the last
century, but to drive the imperialist
occupiers out of Iraq and Afghanistan and to
defeat U.S. imperialism’s wars through
international socialist revolution. We seek
to mobilize the power of the workers
movement in sharp class struggle, including
workers strikes against the war and “hot
cargoing” war material. Why
We
Fight
for Workers Strikes Against the War
(18 October
2007)
|
For Revolutionary Defense of Cuba!
Free the Cuban Five!
On June 5, a
federal appeals court upheld the
convictions of the “Cuban Five”: René
González, Gerardo Hernández, Ramón
Labaniño, Fernando González
and Antonio Guerrero. The
Five heroically risked their lives to
defend the Cuban Revolution against terror
attacks launched from the U.S.
Prosecutors presented evidence that
the five had
infiltrated counterrevolutionary terror
groups in Miami. The government
outrageously charged the defendants
with “conspiracy” to
commit espionage and murder, since there
is not a shred of evidence that they
commited any crime whatsoever. Several
thousand Cubans have been killed in nearly
five decades of invasions, bombings and
assassinations by the U.S. and its gusano
mercenaries. The authors of the notorious
1976 bombing of a Cubana Airlines
passenger plane that killed all 73 aboard,
Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles,
walk around Miami freely while the Cuban
Five have been locked up for nearly a
decade. We demand the Cuban Five be freed
now, and return the U.S. naval base and
torture center at Guantánamo to
Cuba! Free
the Cuban Five! (14 June 2008) |
For an Arab-Hebrew Workers State in
a Socialist Federation of the Near East!
Defend Gaza! Defeat U.S./Israel
War on the Palestinian People!
Last week,
Israeli authorities ordered a halt to all
imports into the Gaza Strip. The world’s
largest concentration camp was sealed off
from the outside world. The Israeli action
was a heinous war crime akin to the Nazis’
confining of Polish Jews to the Warsaw
Ghetto. But the Zionist war criminals are
not acting on their own. The lockdown is
part of a U.S.-Israeli plan to punish the
Gaza population for electing the Islamic
fundamentalist Hamas movement as their
government. Since Hamas won Palestinian
legislative elections in January 2006,
Israeli Zionists and U.S. imperialists
have been directly arming, training and
commanding key Fatah forces to wage a war
on Hamas. The Internationalist Group calls
to mobilize to defeat the joint
U.S./Israeli war on the Palestinian
people. While politically opposing Islamic
fundamentalism, as well as the Christian
fundamentalism fueling the U.S.’
imperialist crusade in the Near East, and
theocratic states like the Jewish state of
Israel, we call for an Arab-Hebrew workers
republic as part of a socialist federation
of the Near East. Defend
Gaza!
Defeat
U.S./Israel War on the Palestinian People!
(26 January 2008)
|
Defend the Puerto Rican Teachers
Federation!
A Case of Labor Colonialism: AFL-CIO
and Change to Win vs. the FMPR
As the Puerto
Rican Teachers Federation prepares to
strike against a virulently anti-labor
governor, braving draconian no-strike
legislation, unions affiliated with the
American Federation of Labor-Congress of
Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) and the
Change to Win (CTW) federation are
outrageously lining up with the bosses.
This will come as no surprise to those who
know something of the sordid history of
the American labor bureaucracy in the
U.S.’ Caribbean island colony, and as
accomplices of imperialist machinations
throughout Latin America (and the rest of
the world). But what the labor fakers are
preparing is a major betrayal of Puerto
Rican workers. The SEIU/CTW is backing a
teachers “association” that includes
management, and which is preparing to scab
on the strike. In 2005 the AFT/AFL-CIO
went to the colonial courts to try to take
over the FMPR. A crucial test is shaping
up in which it is urgent to defend the
Puerto Rican teachers union. The issue is
posed: which side are you on? A
Case of Labor Colonialism: AFL-CIO &
CTW vs. the FMPR (7 February 2008)
|
Brazilian
Teachers Strike Again
for
Freedom for Mumia Abu-Jamal
For a second time, the
teachers union of the Brazilian state of Rio de
Janeiro, SEPE-RJ, set an important example in
calling a strike this past May 7 in defense of
public education and demanding freedom for Mumia
Abu-Jamal. The SEPE has fought for
Mumia’s freedom since 1999, when at the
initiative of the Liga Quarta-Internacionalista
do Brasil (LQB) and its affiliated Class
Struggle Committee (CLC) the teachers union
called the first-ever labor action for Mumia.
During a two-hour work stoppage, events were
held at schools around the state to publicize
Mumia’s case and denounce the racist death
penalty. The next day, dock workers in the
United States shut down all West Coast ports for
ten hours demanding freedom for Jamal. In the face of the
worsening legal situation for Jamal, whose
appeal for a new trial was rejected by the U.S.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the SEPE voted
to again stop work, calling on other unions to
join it in demanding freedom for Jamal. A special issue of the
union newspaper on Mumia was put out for the
strike recounting the facts of his case and the
SEPE’s 1999 work stoppage for his freedom. Brazilian
Teachers
Strike Again for Freedom for Mumia Abu-Jamal
(May 2008) |
Federal
Court Reaffirms Frame-Up Conviction,
Orders Life Behind Bars or Racist Legal
Lynching
Ruling Against Mumia
Shows:
No Justice in the Capitalist Courts
Mobilize the Working
Class to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal!
Abolish the Racist
Death Penalty!
On March 27, the
U.S. appeals court in Philadelphia
reaffirmed the frame-up conviction of Mumia
Abu-Jamal, the former Black Panther Party
spokesman and world-renowned radical
journalist who has been locked up on
Pennsylvania’s death row for more than a
quarter century. After previously rejecting
Mumia’s request to present evidence of his
innocence, as well as a host of issues
showing that he was railroaded by a racist
court, the Court turned down Mumia’s request
for a new trial. It upheld the 2001 ruling
by a federal district judge that ordered a
new hearing on the sentence, but limited the
“choice” to the living hell of life
imprisonment without parole ... or
execution. Mumia is innocent. He was
declared guilty and sentenced to die because
of his revolutionary politics and because
for years he had been a thorn in the side of
the racist rulers of the misnamed “city of
brotherly love.” Around the world, millions
have come out in defense of Jamal. This
latest ruling, like all those that preceded
it, shows that the exploited and oppressed
must have no faith in the racist injustice
system. We call on the workers movement to
mobilize its power to free Mumia now! Mobilize
the
Working
Class to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal! (28 March 2008)
|
90 Years of the
October Revolution
The Russian October
Revolution of 1917 was the seminal event of
the 20th century. The workers’ conquest of power
led by the Bolshevik Party of V.I. Lenin and
Leon Trotsky put an end to World War I and
shook the old order from the imperial
centers of Europe to the farthest reaches of
their colonial “possessions.” The revolution
continued to be key to world events for the
next three-quarters of a century, long after
Stalin and his bureaucratic henchmen had
seized power and betrayed the
internationalist program of Red October. The
counterrevolution that destroyed the Union
of Soviet Socialist Republics along with the
Soviet-bloc bureaucratically deformed
workers states during the period 1989-92
represented a world-historic defeat for the
proletariat of the entire planet. Yet
contrary to the imperialist ideologues,
communism is not dead, we have not entered a
“new world order” of peace and prosperity,
and we have not reached the “end of history”
– far from it. Nor, as a host of
self-proclaimed socialists declare, have we
been thrown back to the period before
October. On the contrary, basing ourselves
on the program and analyses of Lenin and
Trotsky, in order to lead the revolution to
victory, this time on world scale, a central
task facing revolutionaries today is to draw
the lessons both of the victory of 1917 and
of the defeat that opened the post-Soviet
period. 90
Years
of
the October Revolution (November 2007)
|
Fight for Power to Workers and
Peasants Councils!
Trotskyism vs. “Constituent Assembly”
Mania
Over the last several years, calls for the
establishment of a constituent assembly have
been heard in various countries of Latin
America. Around the mass strike and
quasi-uprising in Oaxaca, Mexico during
May-November 2006, demands were raised by
the Popular Assembly of the Peoples of
Oaxaca (APPO) and a host of left groups for
a constituent assembly, a “revolutionary
constituent assembly,” etc. Currently, “center-left” bourgeois populist
regimes led by Evo Morales in Bolivia and
Rafael Correa in Ecuador have sought to
strengthen themselves against right-wing
reaction by calling constituent assemblies. This
bourgeois-democratic demand has been put
forward by revolutionary communists in
fighting against a variety of
pre-capitalist, colonial or bonapartist
regimes. It was one of the key planks of
V.I. Lenin’s Bolsheviks against the tsarist
autocracy in Russia, until it was superseded
as the central demand by “all power to the
soviets” in the course of 1917. Trotsky
raised the call for a national assembly in
China under the warlords, while emphasizing
that it would only be part of a program for
the taking of power by workers and peasants
councils. But the current deluge of calls
for a constituent assembly in ostensibly
bourgeois-democratic regimes is counterposed
to Bolshevism. It replaces the program of
proletarian revolution with that of
(capitalist) “democracy,” a hallmark of
reformist social democrats. Trotskyism
vs.
“Constituent
Assembly” Mania (October 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|